🔗 Share this article

Whenever a significant honors show draws close, there’s always a clamor for the addition additional classifications to acknowledge underappreciated efforts and fill the spirits of followers who have specialized interests.

My colleague made the case for a horror game category. That would rule. Equally deserving are board games, which is someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me if I try to elbow in front just as with other blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial and significant. Here's the proposal: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why movie academies steer clear of genre categories. Yet it remains an unavoidable compromise for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, specific award classifications remain vital.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these six categories successfully include a lot of ground, making space possible for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Examine these examples from outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: building puzzles in a particular game, intense tile-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Which classification works within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games released every year lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

• One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated for anything that year
• Another imaginative release received no nominations during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title got ignored recently
• Just some brain-teasers scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often small games, but the art in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games count as the most-played games globally maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with popular creative games for the title of highest-selling title ever; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, and engaging with diverse game types.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. It would be easy to populate five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the challenging frontier game development, developing some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Just like movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.